Although many people value their public parks this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies To what extent do you agree or disagree

It is undeniable fact that overgrowing population will consume more space on our planet for living purposes. It is often argued that public parks can be reconstructed in the form of residential areas and for other commercial amenities. However, I strongly disagree with this notion.

Apparently, public parks hold a wide range of constructive benefits. To commence with, these parks are necessary for individuals to live a healthy and social life. It helps people to enjoy and relax in their leisure time. For instance, several people like to have morning and evening walks in the park. Apart from that, they like to perform exercises that help individuals to stay physically fit. Secondly, it helps society to bond socially with others, especially in terms of friendship and building a strong relationship among them. Thirdly, yoga is one of the best activities to do in the park instead of doing it at home or at the sports centers. It helps to breathe fresh air while performing different kinds of postures in yoga.

Furthermore, public parks play a vital role in preserving a friendly environment among individuals and other species. Additionally, it reduces the effects of pollution in a particular region because of the different kinds of flora surrounded by it. Besides, trees can reduce the effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and maintain a balanced amount of oxygen for individuals to breathe good and fresh air. Finally, these all points state the value of public parks. Instead of reforming parks into residential areas or commercial complexes, the government can use other places to construct this kind of development for their citizens.

In conclusion, although we required commercial buildings and residential complexes to allocate the space for the rising population, it should not be sacrificed by public parks because they play a crucial role in the part of our lives.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, finally, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17857142857 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88693696554 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594155844156 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1768077919 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8235294118 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28446442147 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822452284526 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696933630461 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17778541518 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488752080175 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.