Are famous people treated unfairly by media Should they be given more privacy or it is the price of their fame an invasion into their private lives

Nowadays, the media plays a critical role in making of renowned people's image. Everyone has a right to spend his life in the way they like. But, most of the time popular people get media invasion into their private lives. In my opinion, the media should intervene less in famous people lives and they should have the ability to enjoy the way normal people do.

In today's world, there are 2.5 billion people who are connected to social media in the form of TV, facebook, Instagram and Twitter naming a few. Thus, it is just a matter of seconds for any news to go viral and affecting famous people's career. For example, in 2018, the news broke out of Imran Khan's second divorce which gave a chance to opposing political parties to mention it in every campaign. Hence, pressurizing his political party for unrelated questions way ahead of the party agenda. Therefore, people on media give biased news about public figures which can lead to decline in their career. They should be given more privacy.

The renowned people also have private lives behind the glamorous world. Though they chose fame over their secrecy, in the end, they all are human beings. People idealize celebrities and fashion icons. Additionally, they like to know more personal stuff about their favorite personalities. Which encourage media to show all aspects of famous people lives just to gain high ratings for their shows and news channels. For examples, a morning show on Geo TV was sued by an actress for showing a fight with her husband on the TV show on behalf of her privacy. In the end, they have the right to live as they wish to.

In my opinion, in spite of being known by millions, famous people still need personal space. They should not be haunted by social media who exploit them for their own sake.

Votes
Average: 3.3 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eer. They should be given more privacy. The renowned people also have private li...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ave the right to live as they wish to. In my opinion, in spite of being known b...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in my opinion, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71656050955 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26663235129 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566878980892 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1469489034 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.9473684211 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5263157895 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414370521677 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1280035563 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992949270491 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251919348038 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531944260423 0.056905535591 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.