Around the world, it is likely that more adults will work from home and more children will study from home as computer technology becomes cheaper and more accessible. Do you think it is a negative or a positive development?
Recently information technologies became less expensive and available for population throughout the world. Thus, it is probable that more grownups will work remotely from a house as well as more children will have home education. In my opinion, this trend has negative as well as positive consequences.
Firstly, I think that computer-aided learning is more harmful than beneficial because I believe that engaging with a teacher and classmates is a crucial for the child’s development. Modern youngsters spend too much time surfing the internet or communicating in the social networks. As a result, they have lack of concentration and disability build normal human connections. Thus conventional class is engaging interactions with human-beings and gaining an important social skill of building strong-relationships with classmates, while machine education is contributing to child’s isolation and the time spent by a child out of real life increases.
However, opportunity to work remotely from an office is beneficial for an employee as well as an employer. Using computer-based communication tools adults can discuss all issues with clients from home and as the most jobs involve a computer it is feasible complete a project from any part of the world even being on a vacation in some remote country. Thus, it safes travelling time from home to a job, expenses of employers for electricity, water supply and other maintenance cost for an office. For instance, the author of the book “4 hours working week” claims that it is cheaper to recruit freelance worker somewhere in India than employ someone for a full-time job. It is more effective and less time-consuming.
In conclusion, worldwide computer spreading has both negative as positive effects. I think, for older generation it is beneficial in terms of saving money and time for work. While, for the youth it would be better off without machine education because they need to be physically engaged in the education process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-20 | docotrieu86@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-22 | ndiep | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-05 | dungneahihi | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-18 | docotrieu86@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-18 | docotrieu86@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- More people are spending their free time watching movies? Why? Good or bad. 61
- People nowadays are used to disposable items meaning that they use things for short time and throw them away What do you think is the cause of this and what problems can it lead to 84
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are used in many countries But in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power has been encouraged Is this trend a positive or a negative development 56
- In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education with a range of subjects. In others, it has a narrow range of specific subjects so students can focus on their future career. What system is more appropriate in today’s world? 78
- Some people think that art is essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both sides and give your opinion 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ability build normal human connections. Thus conventional class is engaging interact...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39365079365 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22666829082 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609523809524 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7095597887 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.266666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240264115748 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812828066395 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996251847795 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15741557094 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120463834241 0.056905535591 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.