The best way to educate children is by using the Internet in every lesson. To what extent do you share this opinion? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children?
It has been argued that the most effective way to educate children is through adapting the Internet in all courses. Although the idea initially appears to be appealing, some investigation will prove that this is not the most effective method and that other viable options are preferable.
Firstly, it may be true that the Internet may provide new opportunities for students; nevertheless, in the long term in would deprive students of the main goals of education. One should not lose the sight of the fact that the main objective of any education is probably to prepare children for their future life. This goal may not be achieved without improving children’s social competencies in the context of their peers’ community; moreover, their personality can be positively affected in contact with their teachers and their circle of friends. Secondly, it might initially appear desirable to adopt online approach to all courses, but a lot of courses which are more laboratory basis should be held under a skilful teacher supervision to perform scientific experiments in an equipped laboratory. In this case, studying online is probably fruitless and may not lead to effective results. Thus, using the Internet in all lessens cannot always leave up to our expectation.
Turning to possible alternatives, probably the most effective method would be a combination of using online courses and attending classes at school. For example, theoretical courses, such as literature and history, are more likely to be handled online rather than practical courses, like laboratory course and field excursions, which requires student attendance. Another viable option would be to hold regular discussion forums at school for an online course to persuade students to communicate with their peers and expand their circle of friends so as to enhance their social skills. As can be seen, these methods can be employed along with using the Internet to provide effective educational options for students.
In conclusion, not only do some courses require physical attendance, but students’ social skills and their personality may also be adversely affected. A combination of physical attendance at school and online teaching along with holding regular discussion meetings for online courses would seem to be far more robust alternatives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Mostafaasadi | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | anna5224 | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | sisiliadysti | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-23 | void | 73 | view |
- Some people think it is better to choose friends who always have the same opinion as them Other people believe it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both these view and give your opinion 67
- ‘Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity.’How far do you share this viewpoint? 73
- The best way to educate children is by using the Internet in every lesson. To what extent do you share this opinion? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children? 73
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking in public buildings such as office and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible argument on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which 73
- In many countries, old or traditional languages are dying out or being forgotten, especially by younger people. Is this an acceptable development which occurs inevitably, or is it something which we should try to prevent? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...eers and expand their circle of friends so as to enhance their social skills. As can be...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43801652893 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93429943131 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542699724518 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3815757498 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9285714286 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128998354716 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588997021369 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556435304859 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958321336083 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596842093247 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.