The best way to solve environmental problems would be for the current generation to accept a simpler way of life for the sake of the next generation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Since the dawn of human civilization, we, smart animal among all others, are damaging our mother nature. There is long list of different environment problems we have created since long time. There is one solution for it is to live simple life, as we used to live before, for the betterment of our kids. Is it possible to live simple life in this fast-paced era? I shall discuss more about this topic in coming paragraphs.
Nowadays, we are more dependent on technologies and automations and thus, we put nature on back seat. Environment plays an essential role in our life. There are many nature related issues such as global warming, air pollution, water pollution, deforestation, acid rain and many more. The better option to fight and cope up with these problems is start living simple life as our ancestors used to do. If we stop using vehicles, then we can automatically reduce the level of carbon dioxide in our surrounding environmental, which directly affects global warming. It also reduces air and noise pollution. No vehicles on road means no need of fossil fuels for cars and other transportation vehicles. It could reduce air pollution done by many big industries producing fossil fuels from the Earth. Our great grand father used to live life in town and growing food in farms. So, if current generation move to towns and start farming then we can help environment a lot and it gives back more benefits to us.
On the other hand, change is nature of life. I, personally, think that it is hard or impossible to move back in simple life, as we are living in technological era. Live simple life can be affects to citizen in many ways, they are not used to it, also no one have any ideas about a source of income in that lifestyle. As cities are expanding very quick, necessity thing stores are far out in cities, and in simple lifestyle it is almost impossible to go there for shopping and come back home within couple of hours.
What is more, there are some solution related to environmental problems, by that we can control over it and make it good world not for us but also for next generations too. There are many automobile companies started to manufacture electric vehicle, which direct good impact on to the earth’s atmosphere. Planting trees are also one great option to save our environment. Individual and government could make same effort to solve some nature related issues and make it batter place to live. Nevertheless, renewable energy is the greatest option for many applications for our day to day life and it is free of cost.
In conclusion, to move back to town and start living simple life is not advisable for anyone. But we can consider many other options to solve environment related problems and put more effort on renewable energy education for all live species living on the planet Earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-06 | Shivam1512 | 73 | view |
- Television dominates the free time of too many people It can make people lazy and prevent them from socialising with others Do you agree or disagree 61
- Recent advances in air travel have focused only on those sitting in first class and have left other passengers with no benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that having a set of retirement age eg 65 years for everybody regardless of occupations is unfair They believe that certain workers deserve to retire and receive a pension at an early age Do you agree or disagree Which types of workers d 53
- You are planning a vacation and want your friend to go with you Write a letter to your friend In your letter you should Tell her why you want to take a vacation Describe your plan Invite her to go with you 73
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate online without any face to face contact with other people Does it have a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...species living on the planet Earth.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, then, thus, in conclusion, such as, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2354.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 492.0 315.596192385 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78455284553 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64909065046 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506097560976 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 774.0 506.74238477 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4646067082 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5384615385 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84615384615 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152346895199 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442969187581 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487459336493 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989214162199 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386875643841 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.