Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years than many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam
How true do you think this statement is
What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars?
It is a widely accepted argument that the number of car increase during the last 3 decades contribute directly to traffic issues in major cities around the world. This paper will discuss the given argument and provide recommendations to encourage people using public transports.
There are several type of vehicles could be used for traveling but car have been the most popular among people. Citizens choosing car because of its safety, durability and mobility. For instance, a high quality car ensure safety for drives by airbags during an accident or it could useful when drivers travel to multiple destinations. Moreover, with the booming of population in mega cities, the number of car skyrocket is inevitable, as a result traffic jam becomes common in big cities included New York, London and Paris.
There are number of solution should be taken to encourage people to participated in public transportation. First of all, taxes rate imposed on car should be increased to a higher rate, therefore car ownership would switch to public transport. Secondly, to attract more customers, transportation fee needed to be reduced or recalculated until it becomes appropriate for people. Finally, more money should be spent to maintain the quality of public transportation. For example, the authority should pay more attention and financial support to maintain and upgrade roads or railways to maximize the productivity of these vehicles.
In conclusion, traffic jam happened due to the excessive increase in the number of private cars and there are several solutions should be taken regarding to this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-03 | hungnguyen012 | 61 | view |
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 61
- It is a highly debatable issue that medical system developments result in higher life expectancy for people but also create negative impacts on their life. This essay will illustrate the reasons why drawbacks outweigh the advantages regarding to this issu 56
- The given graph and table illustrate the average monthly degree and the total hours of daylight in three different cities included New York, London and Sydney during a year. 73
- It is a highly debatable issue that medical system developments result in higher life expectancy for people but also create negative impacts on their life. 84
- It is a highly debatable issue that medical system developments result in higher life expectancy for people but also create negative impacts on their life. This essay will illustrate the reasons why drawbacks outweigh the advantages regarding to this issu 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun type seems to be countable; consider using: 'several types'.
Suggestion: several types
...ple using public transports. There are several type of vehicles could be used for traveling...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30196078431 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90586382995 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7142101867 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16814301708 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06290797871 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462233082627 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11234342621 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354437085027 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.