Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past 30 years that many cities in the world are now 'one big traffic jam'. More people should use public transport. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past 30 years that many cities in the world are now 'one big traffic jam'. More people should use public transport. Do you agree or disagree?

Around the world, as well as in my city, people are spending more time stuck in the traffic than they were a few decades ago. I think that the popular adoption of public transport is necessary if cities have to function efficiently.

Undoubtedly having a private car has its benefits. Most important of them all is the extreme convenience it provides, especially to the families with kids. For instance, most of the commercial centers where I go from my home are at least 10-15 minutes walk from the nearest bus stops. This means that every time I am traveling with my wife and 2 kids, I have to be very careful with kids crossing the road.

Nevertheless, the benefits of using public transport far outweigh those of private cars. For instance, public transport makes efficient use of road capacity. A normal bus takes as much road space as 3 cars, but it can have 50-60 people traveling in that space as compared to 4-6 people traveling in private cars. One of the major roads in my city center has gotten a new metro bus lane that is exclusive to only busses. According to recent statistics, 5 times more people travel through that one lane as compared to the other 2 car lanes combined.

Furthermore, public transport is a safer mode of transport for both passengers as well as road users. Since drivers of public buses are employes and trained, they take their job professionally and drive within the speed limits and lanes. In my city, people are even afraid to walk or cycle even for short distance because occasionally car drivers end up driving very close to the sidelines in order to break free of traffic.

In conclusion, traffic jams are increasingly creating problems for the city. Usage of public transport would not only make cities safer and more efficient, it would also benefit the environment by reducing air pollution.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-11-05 insidematrix 84 view
Essays by user insidematrix :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...r mode of transport for both passengers as well as road users. Since drivers of public bus...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, well, at least, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78125 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61778025004 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9087279456 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.625 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163797016639 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576805855691 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387190299635 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980566903294 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477678394308 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.