In the contemporary era, usage of computers for learning has been extensively increasing. Nonetheless, this became a debatable situation. Although somebody thinks it is beneficial, others comprehend that this has grim effects on the students. This essay will parse both the perceptions and in furtherance declares my opinion. I however consider this advancement as a boon to the knowledge seekers because it can be accessed any time and anywhere unlike classroom lectures.
The services of the technology in the field of education has proven to be undeniable as e-learning enhanced and revolutionized the children's study by providing bountiful information regarding discrete concepts. Digital and video lectures makes Learners flexibly absorb even the most convoluted topics like cake walk. This saves a lot of time and effort required to accomplish some complicated tasks. For example, digital classes has numerous visual examples with three dimensional figures which enables pupil to imagine and correlate many things.
Over dependence on electronic gadgets may lead to disruption of imagination of the children. On the contrary to the former advantages, it is a canonical fact that it makes students inactive. Eventually children will be unable to works hard being overly dependent on the internet. Also the discussion and exchange of information among the learners diminishes. For instance, pupil no longer refer different books for assignments and projects, instead they just copy some information from the internet.
Considering and keenly examining all the above cited information, this issue has both pro's and con's. Nevertheless, It is quite obvious that the positives overshadows the disadvantages. Hence it can be concluded that use of this technology is mostly advantageous in knowledge enhancement despite of some minor short comings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...being overly dependent on the internet. Also the discussion and exchange of informat...
^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ositives overshadows the disadvantages. Hence it can be concluded that use of this te...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, so, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10301955531 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.811311636 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195185251355 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550890340517 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404393119756 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11149251151 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525827720796 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.