Countries become more developed due to mix of different people and their culture. Do you agree or disagree?
Possibility of nations development with the diversity of inhabitants can be highly debated as it takes decades to measure the true results. Before that we can only make our beliefs and predict consequences on our assumptions. My opinion is in the favor of this statement and I will provide my reasons in subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, I think that cultures define way of living so by interacting with them we could adopt positive aspects and evolve as a whole. For example, Chinese are hard-working people as recognized in world, with their involvement in Pakistan through the projects of China-Pakistan economic corridor, we have seen a rise in competition which has not only forced companies to equip with latest technology for survival but also people have improved their working style. Additionally, way of life, observed from others, could be used to redefine living style as in housing and means of transport.
Secondly, human thinking capabilities changes from bloodline to bloodline as put forth in the research study of sociology department in New York University. Allowing different races to work with others, help develop minds and make them capable enough to see things from every different angle. For instance, discrete scientific researchers are always performed by group of scientist belonging to different countries. By observing fruitful results from this type of collaborations, countries like Australia have stated issuing permanent residence visas to skilled persons. This thing will not only populate the big land area, which is mostly vacant, but also bring versatility.
In conclusion, extrapolating the results from above arguments, it seem advisable to say that diversity can develop countries by providing better options for living and out-of-box thinking.
- The gap between rich and poor is becoming wider, rich becoming more rich and poor even poorer. What problems can the situation cause and give the solutions. 84
- By paying more to employees based on their performance level you can keep their motivation high Do you agree this is the best way to encourage employees 56
- Science could help people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Would that be a good or bad development? Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Scientists predict that in future cars will be driven by computers. What is the reason behind this? Is this a positive or negative development? 61
- There is an increasing amount of advertising directed at children which encourages them to buy goods such as toys and snacks. Many parents are worried that these advertisements put too much pressure on children, while some advertisers claim that they prov 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
... has not only forced companies to equip with latest technology for survival but also people...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...ng the results from above arguments, it seem advisable to say that diversity can dev...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50724637681 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99545444332 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655797101449 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5234114482 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0954627784403 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291326681032 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337324775982 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0534872379916 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194942644186 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.