It is true that many countries are working on fulfilling the requirements of rapid growth of their population in which making new homes is one of the biggest issue to be settled. In my point of view, those new homes should be developed in current cities instead of countryside areas. I feel this way for a number of reasons which are explained below.
First of all, we need to plan our solution in number of steps. For instance, what is the best area to construct new shelters, how much land do we need to allocate people by creating new homes, and what will be the consequences of our decision.
I believe that developing new homes in rural areas would not be a right choice. Firstly, it will be difficult to start construction far from city as labours, machineries and construction materials require to be sent to countryside. Secondly, I am afraid that the lives of countryside people would get affected because they have a simple lifestyle, they live in open air and work in fields. Their routine life would be damaged. Thirdly, there is a huge difference between the living standard of rural and urban people and I am sure that they cannot mix up with each other.
Furthermore, there are some significant advantages if we construct new homes in existing urban areas. We already have prodigious amount of land available in our cities which can be utilized for providing accommodation to the increasing population. Moreover, if we are going to make new homes, we should not forget that there are some other important necessities of life that needs to be considered. For example, hospitals, educational institutes, shopping centres and transportation services are the major requirements of people followed by shelters. However, these facilities are already present in urban areas.
In conclusion, I would state that the apt choice would be building new homes in existing cities. It benefits people by giving them other important facilities of life in a cost effective way and would not affect rural life.
- A country is experiencing population growth and needs more homes. Should these new homes be constructed in the existing cities or should new towns be built for this purpose? Explain. 56
- A country is experiencing population growth and needs more homes. Should these new homes be constructed in the existing cities or should new towns be built for this purpose? Explain. 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l be the consequences of our decision. I believe that developing new homes in r...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all, i am afraid, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9616519174 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85032999784 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545722713864 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.318567265 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9411764706 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4117647059 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369522925844 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113075228777 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831292390703 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201573105533 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807888103537 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.