Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
International music that we hear these days should replace traditional musics of different countries.
A considerable number of people assert that traditional music must give way to modern music to flourish. Others, on the other hand, are adamant opponents of the aforementioned view, claiming that traditional music isn’t replaceable. As far as I am concerned, there is a plethora of cogent and compelling arguments to buttress the latter, thereby I am predisposed to gainsay the former.
One reason why I am fundamentally in disaccord with the brought forth issue has to do with the fact that unlike modern music, traditional musics such as classical music are vital parts of many European cultures. In my observation classical masterpieces written by composers as Mozart, Bach and Vivaldi have largely penetrated (into) different aspects of European lifestyles. For a supporting example one need investigate no further than a Saturday evening in Covent Garden packed with thousands of Londoners who, while elegantly dressed, are walking down the street after enjoying a night of classical music concert. Undoubtedly, it would be impossible to convince these classic ladies and gentlemen to shift their tastes towards Lady Gaga or other pop musicians. Hence, as classical music, one category of traditional music, is so deeply ingrained into every element of life for many countries, it would be ridiculous to assume that this style will ultimately be replaced by modern music.
To add further credence to my assertion I note that certain traditional musics such as folklore carry religious and symbolic messages to some cultures. In my view, many Pagans and Druids listen to their folklore during their rituals to worship their gods and goddesses. A sort of example that aptly illustrates my assertion has to do with the Summer Solstice ritual in Stonehedge performed by Pagans and Wiccans alike. They play their flute and their many other traditional instruments while dancing naked to celebrate the arrival of the summer season and to thank the god of the sun for bringing them blessings galore. It will be hard to imagine such deeply religious rituals conducted while listening to Justin Timberlake. So, we can see that traditional music is the music that carries thousands of years of history and religion with itself, whereas modern music communicates a message heavily influenced by marketing purposes.
In a nutshell, I am of adamant position that modern music cannot be treated as an alternative to traditional music and neither should be considered as such. I take this view on account in a fit of the fact that traditional music is not only deeply woven into every fabric of many European cultures and their lifestyles but it is also the preferred music of the old religions of European continent prior to the arrival of Christianity and Islam.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?International music that we hear these days should replace traditional musics of different countries. 78
- More and more people immigrate to English speaking countries to live, work and study. Why is English such an important international language? Why do people immigrate to the aforementioned countries? 78
- Many parents encourage young people to leave home when they become older, while others think they should stay at home with the family.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- Nowadays consumer goods have become the most important part of people’s lives. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Nowadays many people choose ready-made food and refuse to cook at home. Why do you think it happens? What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a choice? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 535, Rule ID: THE_FALL_SEASON[1]
Message: Use simply 'summer'.
Suggestion: summer
...ncing naked to celebrate the arrival of the summer season and to thank the god of the sun for bri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, whereas, while, as to, sort of, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 448.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18973214286 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87421569687 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542410714286 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.3391233908 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.3125 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27607780715 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929113121278 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797300367806 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172309393793 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346866492615 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.