Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes?
Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Give reasons for your viewpoint.
Many people afraid of nuclear technology because of the dangers associated with its use. If the technology is delivered to the wrong hand such as terrorists or irresponsible rulers, a mass destruction is inevitable. However, some industrialized and mighty countries have been using it as a source of cheap energy and also for a medical treatment purpose. In my viewpoint, it could be used for the constructive purpose as long as handled responsibly and with a due care.
The most worrying aspect of nuclear technology is its use for the military purpose to make weapons. The powerful countries have already made enough atomic bombs as other nukes to destroy the whole planet. Our world has already seen two greatest wars and many others. If any war is breakout it future and nukes are used, the destruction is unimaginable. After the fall of USSR, the technology is fonded to many ambitious countries such as India, Pakistan, North Korea, and others. But if the technology is by mistake provided to any terrorist group, they could cause mega-destruction. Thus, many people believe that the only way to maintain peace in the world is to safely destroy all the nuclear weapons which are made until now and promise not to produce them in the future.
On the other hand, nuclear technology is proven as a source of cheap and reliable power. Many industrialized and some developing countries are using nuclear plants to produce a large amount of energy to meet the continued growing demand. Although few small or medium accidents and a couple of majors had already happened, yet scientists believe it could be a reliable source of energy in the future. Likewise, controlled and measured rays are used to diagnose and treat many diseases. For example, X-ray is a widely used method for medical diagnosis and radiotherapy is used to kill or control cancer cells to spread.
In conclusion, the consequences of the misuse of nuclear technology are always frightening. But if it is handled by expertise and greater with care, it has some significant scope to achieve positive impacts. Nuclear technology should be used for the true benefit of mankind with responsibly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-29 | mifas meleraroth | 61 | view |
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are still required. Discuss both views and give y 61
- Many people believe that women make better parents than men and that is why they have a greater role in raising children in most societies Others claim that men are just as good as women at parenting 84
- In recent years proportion of crime committed by youngsters is on the rise family are solely responsible for this trend Do you agree or disagree with the statement 93
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much. However some others think extremely dangerous games should be banned. Why do people take part in dangerous sports give some suggestions on how to deal with dangerous. 73
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world spends numerous government expenditures. This money should be use in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: AFRAID_OF_HEIGHT[2]
Message: The noun should be probably in the plural form: 'technologies'.
Suggestion: technologies
Many people afraid of nuclear technology because of the dangers associated with ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02777777778 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8596598261 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0150530873 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2631578947 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9473684211 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242407593924 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797932280787 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853672348486 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169558880793 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591736590543 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.