In the modern era, most students in European countries acquire professional experience before they enter university life. According to the experts, to cultivate financial independence and experience in professionalism, the youths should do something before undergraduate. I completely agree with this statement and in the following paragraphs, I will give arguments for my support.
To begin with, before getting admission to the university, entering into the corporate world helps a student to enhance their professional and personal skills such as communication with colleagues and collaborating as a team member to become a responsible employee. Moreover, it will help them to upgrade their academic grades. According to the research of Michigan University, those who have working experience do better in the exam and have more practical knowledge. In addition, working with a resource management team a student can improve his interaction and organizing skills. From my personal experience, this type of work makes me a good communicator and teaches me how I can utilize the resources in the best way which will be very helpful for me in the job sector.
However, besides communication, organization skills, a job will make a pupil financially independent and help him to carry his educational expenses. Working experience will introduce him to the practicality of real-life and help him to choose the best way or the best subject for him. For example, if a pupil has good management skills then it will motivate him to read business faculty in the university. Finally, it will boost self-confidence and bring maturity to make wise decisions.
In conclusion, it is a contentious issue among people and different people give their comments from different perspectives. To sum up all the points above, I can say the students should do some professional work before starting the higher study.
- The line graphs below show the production and demand for steel in million tonnes and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 73
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety Therefore some people think that government should increase spending on defense but spend less on social benefits To what extent you agree 84
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, however, if, moreover, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38590604027 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23746904256 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577181208054 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8484856985 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164921431367 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563034350541 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347828070176 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103453832715 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402165315968 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.