The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts demonstrate the utilization of water which was utilized by five particular types of shops in Sydney, Australia in two particular years 1997 and 2007.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the food industry used the highest portion of water in both years, while the building industry was the least.
To begin with the food industry, in 1997 almost half of the water, clearly, 48% was used by this sector, then after ten years, the amount declined 7% from the previous record. Nevertheless, it remained the highest, while in the case of the building industry, in 2007, only 2% of total water had been used, and it was less than 3% from the previous decade. In the manufacturing industry, the value climbed down to 15 to 11 percent.
However, every sector decreased their usages in the next period, whereas there was a significant change in the service industry. While the percentage was 13 in 1997 but after 10 years the amount was doubled than the previous value. Noe turning to the household usages, similar to service but not noticeably, 2% percent increased in 2007.
- The chart below gives information about the ratio of income to spending in dollars by Americans by age range in 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspapers and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The bar graph below represents the data about the clubs joined by the people of two different age groups at a leisure centre in a small city Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You sh 61
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- The table below shows the production of cacao beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, then, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86243386243 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52256133655 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597883597884 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4314424639 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143311895564 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595442867782 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446528997446 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902644057381 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400698735395 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.