It is irrefutable that selection criteria for any job become a debatable topic as rate of unemployment has increased drastically over last two decades. A handful of people ponder that recruiters ought to prioritize behavior of individual above his degree certificates and experiences. I am in consummate accord with given notion. My inclination is justified in upcoming paragraphs.
Out of all the arguments the most predominant one to prove my point is that personal qualities just like honesty, punctuality, flexibility etcetera define the social qualification of an individual and which guide to ameliorate work environment of organisation. Growth of in total depends on relations among their workers and which is directly connected with behavior of one with other. Tp exemplify, as per recent serve transporancy and trust between management and employees play a pivotal role in progress on organisation.
Furthermore, in this contemporary era world is running on the brand value and to create good image ethical status along with technical skill is essential.For instance, organisation such as tata group is well know for their value in all over the world.
On counter side, the conservationist postulate that company runs on the basis of new ideas and innovation. The more the technical skill, the more the innovation will be. Experienced and qualified employees are able to assist and represent company at international level. For example, first reputation of any organisation would build on qualifications of there management specially ceo.
On compendium, i would like to ingeminate that although experiences and qualifications requir at certain position of organisation, yet ethics and behavior is essential for sustainable and continuous development.
- Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some think that students must travel to another country in order to learn its language and customs To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pivotal role in progress on organisation Furthermore in this contemporary era wor...
^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ow for their value in all over the world On counter side the conservationist post...
^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...management specially ceo On compendium i would like to ingeminate that although ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, well, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49626865672 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27740897001 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634328358209 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 268.0 20.2975951904 1320% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1473.0 106.682146367 1381% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 268.0 20.7667163134 1291% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 68.0 7.06120827912 963% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108755328007 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108755328007 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0569837157862 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202620768595 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 138.5 13.0946893788 1058% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -217.46 50.2224549098 -433% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 110.2 11.3001002004 975% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.1 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.94 8.58950901804 255% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 68.0 9.78957915832 695% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 109.2 10.1190380762 1079% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 22.0 10.7795591182 204% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.