Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree with this?
It is sometimes thought personal traits of the candidate should be given more emphasis than the qualifications and experience while hiring a new employee. However, I disagree with this opinion and believe that qualifications and experience ought to be the chief criteria for recruitment.
Firstly, relevant education and qualifications are required for most of the academic jobs. In other words, professions such as medicine, dentistry and law need a specialised educational background and, therefore, while selecting a person for these occupations educational qualification should be paramount and personal characteristics are often of very less significance. Moreover, it is not easier to determine the personal qualities of the interviewees in a recruitment interview not only due to the shortage of time but also due to the fact that candidates can even fake those qualities.
Secondly, job experience is often very helpful in choosing the right person for the company because it provides a fair insight into the past endeavours of the candidate as well as it also the show credibility of the job seeker. For example, if a person has three to four years of work experience in a single company, particularly in the software industry, then that person seen as a reliable. Furthermore, a person with a fair amount of experience are often adaptive and could start contributing to the organisation without or with very little training.
Finally, although qualifications and experience should be the most focused factor while recruitment, personal characteristics such as honesty and flexibility should be assessed in the probationary period. Probation period, generally a one month induction period, is ample amount to evaluate personal characteristics and provide constructive feedback to the newly joined employee to improve on them.
In conclusion, qualified and experienced create the most value for a company and these two factors should be the most look for factors in an interview and personal qualities can only be assessed effectively in a longer period of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-17 | rihanaya | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | Singh009 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-23 | mandeepKSharma | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | samlekhi | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | ADEYOMOLA ADEBAYO | 73 | view |
- Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree with this? 73
- Even though globalization affects the world’s economies in a very positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. Discuss 78
- Some people think that hobbies should be linked with technology while other Believe that it is not necessary for hobbies to be involved with technology discuss what is your reason Give reason for your answer and include examples from your experience 92
- Some people believe that smartphones are destroying social interaction today To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Many Offenders commit more crime after serving the first punishments Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problems 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e probationary period. Probation period, generally a one month induction period, ...
^^
Line 9, column 220, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nly be assessed effectively in a longer period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...effectively in a longer period of time.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46894409938 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29237808912 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.9348960573 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.090909091 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2727272727 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.5454545455 7.06120827912 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27457824178 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110214465281 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433648531729 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152391963211 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428843434441 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.04 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.