Employers should focus on the personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree with this?
Today’s work environment is more competitive than ever before and dynamic in nature. Social skills enable us to develop our own abilities to survive in a very competitive environment while helps a team to collaborate and perform better. These days, especially in times of transition and globalisation, technical skills and academic knowledge are not enough- social skills are also required to become a successful professional.
First, some social skills are quite mandatory for an employee to work in an office where people with different designations and skill set work together. Discipline, ability to criticise oneself, communication skills, negotiation skills, ability to give and take criticism and team capabilities enable someone to work in a multinational company and become a successful worker. Lack of those social skills will put someone far back in the race. Technical skills are essential to actually execute something while corporate and social skills are essential to working in a team or serving customers. They both are essential qualities of a good employee and hence both should be present to be successful in a job.
Second, our social skills take a very long time to develop while some technical skills could be taught to employees in few months. For instance, if someone with a very good academic background and social skills tries to learn how to operate a computer, would be able to do so in six months. However, no one can guarantee how long it will take to teach someone responsibility, self-confidence and discipline. It might take forever is some cases. From this regards, hiring authorities of a company should emphasise more on social skills of a candidate along with the other important qualifications for the job.
Finally, corporate offices are like a big tree with many branches and roots. The employees are often considered as the roots of a company and if the roots are not firm and healthy enough, the tree is sure to suffer. Social skills are important for the employees to act as healthy and performing roots for a company.
In summary, there is no denying to the fact that proper qualifications along with the better social skills are essential ingredients for the success of a person in professional life. The social skills among employees are also vital for the overall growth and productivity of an organisation as well. This is why a company must put a considerable emphasise on finding employees with better social skills and also arrange seminars and training sessions to enhance the employee's social skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-17 | rihanaya | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | Singh009 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-23 | mandeepKSharma | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | samlekhi | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | ADEYOMOLA ADEBAYO | 73 | view |
- An increasing number of people are buying what they need online. What are the advantages and disadvantages? 67
- Employers should focus on the personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree with this? 89
- An increasing number of people are buying what they need online. What are the advantages and disadvantages? 73
- Employers should focus on the personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree with this? 61
- Some young people are leaving the countryside to live in cities and towns, leaving only old people in the countryside. What problem does this cause? What can be done to solve the problem? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 451, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... might take forever is some cases. From this regards, hiring authorities of a compan...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, well, while, for instance, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16786570743 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97108656587 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482014388489 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 689.4 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2138831055 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.421052632 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9473684211 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116684389502 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429935449927 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491897801153 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700323689129 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043572357642 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.