Employers of labour often pay younger people equal salary as older contemporaries. I am of the opinion that remuneration should be based on experience and skills irrespective of age. The following will explain my views in detail.
In the Labour Market, experience and skills matter and it informs employment decisions. Firstly, a younger employee could be more experienced than an older employee which often translates to higher pay. For instance, some companies have different employment packages for more experienced employees engaged in the same role with less experienced ones. Besides, an employer of labour would compensate a higher skilled worker more than lower one engaged in similar roles. For example, a Banker with a Master's degree and an accounting qualification should be expected to earn higher than one with just a Bachelor's degree doing the same job. Thus, skills and experience matters in the working environment.
However, it would be a total injustice for employers to discriminate in pay without a clear discrepancy in the number of working years and qualifications obtained regardless of their ages in same role. This entails that similar skills and experience should be offered equal renumeration. Hypothetically, if John has worked as an Engineer with the same number of years as Tom, he is right to anticipate equal pay. Therefore, for justice to prevail in the workplace, equality of wages for contemporaries with similar conditions should be encouraged.
In conclusion, age should never be considered as a factor that determines compensation in a workplace. Equivalent wages amongst employees on the same job is only valid when they have similar skills and experience.
- Some people think the modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Employers should pay young people the same salary as older colleagues doing the same job To what extend do you agree or disagree 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ensate a higher skilled worker more than lower one engaged in similar roles. For ...
^^
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a bachelor' or simply 'Bachelors'?
Suggestion: a bachelor; Bachelors
...ected to earn higher than one with just a Bachelors degree doing the same job. Thus, skills...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40074906367 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11212743132 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554307116105 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4039349836 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193629466776 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06484499953 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548721902849 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122124649229 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184495751343 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.