Employers should pay young people the same salary as older colleagues doing the same job To what extent do you agree or disagree

Nowadays, it is a common belief that young adults should be paid the same remuneration as older colleagues who work for the same job. However, I strongly disagree to these perceptions due to several major elements and this essay will address the reasons for my views as follows.

First and foremost, there are wide range of factors that should be considered when paying young people the same salary as older employees. One of its obvious drawback is unequal for young employees to only be hired when they can meet high-standard while older staff got hired with fewer requests. Nowadays, a number of intelligent workers at young age is recorded due to rapid development of technology. Hence, to have stable job with high salary most of them had to work and study around the clock to be accepted. If an employer pay a 22 years old new staff who is proficient at multi skills has the same amount of a low-tech staff then it would be unfair.
In addition to the reasons above, I also believe that with the help of youthful energy from young adults, they will ameliorate the working environment. Likewise, attributed to staff's efficiency to work more effectively. On top of that, company owners should concentrate on their employee's positive energy in order for the company to grow faster. For instance, a young caring, benevolent staff can easily make an older sorrowful employee blissful, this is a beneficial impact as employees are helping and connect tightly with each other.

To encapsulate, I completely detest the idea of both young people and older colleagues should have the same income while doing the same job. Personally, young people have greater skill and proficient at cooperation so in fact they should be paid higher remuneration than their colleagues.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... study around the clock to be accepted. If an employer pay a 22 years old new staf...
^^
Line 4, column 177, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'staff'.
Suggestion: staff
...ng environment. Likewise, attributed to staffs efficiency to work more effectively. On...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, likewise, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97643097643 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6904147802 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582491582492 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1002010985 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.692307692 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305323405786 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109125400487 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126856386514 0.0667982634062 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194309751251 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965390072594 0.056905535591 170% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.