Some people argue that it is inappropriate for HR managers or department heads to ask candidates the questions of hobbies or interests, or other personal information. While some of them indeed agree with that it is a good action that you can learn more about the people who will probably be working with you in your orgnization. In this essay, I will discuss both points of view and then give my own opinion.
Some people feel offended while being asking personal information at interviews, as they think there is nothing related to personal life in job description that HR managers list on a recruitment ads. If the candidates are invited to an interview, all questions are supposed to be work related, such as whether the candidates can meet all requirements for the position, whether their abilities are matched. There are not such problems that a single person can solve yet a married one can’t.
Certainly, there are other people supporting that personal status will impact on their working performance eventually. If the candidates have common hobbies or interests with all the other existing employees, they perhaps have similar qualities or personalities, it is easier for newbies to fit in the group and perform well as expected. For example, Vodafone NZ books squash courts on Friday evenings for all the staff to play games or socialise with others at the bar. According to the HR’s statistics, the new employees who play squash are one week earlier to get job on than them who don’t play. On one hand, squash player are fast learners, more targeted and focused on one point. On the other hand, it is certainly a chance to communicate with other people from different floors and departments, thus, they could have a relatively complete concept about the company and its culture.
In conclusion, HR managers have to consider one’s personal life through hobbies or interests or other aspects which may be factors affecting work performance for some positions. I, of course, agree with them asking questions, however, all the questions should be asked in a respectful and polite manners.
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking.Discuss both 78
- There have been some problems with the bus service, especially its reliability, in your area over the last two weeks.Write a letter to the manager of the bus company. In your letter• describe what the problems are• explain how these problems are 73
- Last month you had a holiday overseas where you stayed with some friends They have just sent you some photos of your holiday Write a letter to your friends In your letter thank them for the photos and for the holiday explain why you didn t write earlier i 65
- You stayed with your friend and by mistake carried home one Of his objects. Write a letter and explain-how are you enjoyed staying with your friend.-Explain the object which you brought with you by mistake and explain how much stake happened -mention how 73
- You recently ordered an item that was advertised as having a discount from the normal price but you have found that when you paid you did not get the discount Write to the company In your letterExplain that you did not get the discountTell them where 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...terests, or other personal information. While some of them indeed agree with that it ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onal status will impact on their working performance eventually. If the candidate...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03714285714 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75939804143 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548571428571 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.0106465053 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.928571429 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332729694555 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108065778187 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063422040309 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204871014941 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403550812828 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.