Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbles and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this Information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is generally well-known that, applying for a job requires multiple steps and amongst these steps, and not o mention, the most important as well is the interview. Employers tend to perform the interviews with applicants through different methods, and through it, they sometimes ask for various personal information. For instance, the marital status, hobbies and interests. People's opinion vary when it comes to the usefulness of giving away such information or not.
Embarking upon the first perspective for the people who are in favor for telling those kind of information. Their idea is based on different aspects, for example, the marital status can relate to how much the applicant is willing to be committed. Moreover, it can show the capability of the applicant of leading a team, in case of team leader jobs. Another aspect lies in deciding whether the applicant is fit for the job or not in terms of stamina for instance. As if the applicant does an active sport as a hobby, it can correlate to his/her physical abilities.
On the other hand, people who are against giving away their personal information are afraid to be judged, or even more sometimes discriminated, due to their interests in their personal life such as listening to rap music. Furthermore, they believe that whether getting accepted or not, should only depend on their experience, qualifications and skills. Besides, some employers do not accept to hire a female applicant once they know that she is newly married, only to avoid giving her a maternity leave. I remember once, my wife possessed all the skills needed for a certain job; however, she was only refused due to being married.
To conclude, although knowing plethora of information about an applicant is mandatory; nevertheless, employers should never judge applicants based on the hobbies, interests, marital status and religion.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-22 | Ahmed Shehata | 84 | view |
- More and more business and individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face to face. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating 73
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbles and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this Information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these vi 84
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind, such as reading and doing word puzzles.Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time.•You should write at least 250 words 61
- In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing. What do you think are the main causes of crime?How can we deal with those causes?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 84
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exampl 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...the people who are in favor for telling those kind of information. Their idea is based on ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... newly married, only to avoid giving her a maternity leave. I remember once, my w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18032786885 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84490425977 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603278688525 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.270750248 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.857142857 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319992228025 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100472747549 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613652734278 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175422882914 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781916048296 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.