Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their habits and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Generally, provisioning of personal details such as an individual's hobbies or marital status while applying for a job is questionable among certain demographics of the society. However, others think that sometimes this data might be useful for employers when filtering candidates. This essay will discuss both viewpoints to present an opinion conclusively.
On one side, personal interests of an individual reflects one's personality and social behavior. For example, If one mentions sports as one's favorite leisure time activity, then It shows that one would be physically and socially active. While reading book reflects compulsive reader. For certain jobs such as journalist, receptionist, customer care executive certain factors from their personal data have to be taken under consideration and employers analyze an individual applicant psychologically by considering these factors. Therefore, I agree that such questionnaires should be included by employers.
On the other hand, some candidates feel that it is unnecessary and insufficient usage of time during interviews by asking personal questions rather than directly asking technical questions to evaluate their skills. Moreover, job seekers sometimes feel bit reluctant or offended while asking marital status, especially If one is widow or divorcee. However, I strongly disagree with this viewpoint as asking someone about their interests is an easy way to initiate conversation. In addition to this, interviewers generally ask such questions to make applicant comfortable rather than jumping to technical details. With regard to being offended when facing questions to their marital status, In my opinion they should be bold enough to deal with the reality and proudly answer.
To conclude, brief personal details about the candidate is essential for employers to better analyse an applicant and to run interview process smoothly.
- The system used for rubbish garbage collection in your local area is not working properly This is causing problems for you and your neighbours Write a letter to the local council describe how rubbish collection system is not working properly explain how t 95
- Nowadays, the internet and television have given ordinary people a chance to become famous. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In today’s times internet is making it easy to study online from home. Some prefer online courses to study and they think it is better. Others prefer classroom education. Discuss both views and share your opinion. 89
- You work in an office and have recently been experiencing a health problem You think that the problem started because of the working conditions in the office Write a letter to your manager In your letter describe the health problem explain why you think i 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...nal interests of an individual reflects ones personality and social behavior. For ex...
^^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... For example, If one mentions sports as ones favorite leisure time activity, then It...
^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ould be physically and socially active. While reading book reflects compulsive reader...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in fact, such as, in my opinion, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76868327402 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02886490599 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4418044802 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.785714286 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245886813022 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828681473534 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442952115907 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148846993509 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050822657725 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.