In 21st century, development is happening at an intensively high rate across the world. But is this vogue advantageous for the environment or the society at large? Though, many people consider it as a boon because of the convenience caused by it. However, there is a horde of people who do not concur with this notion. This essay will shed some light on the pros and cons of it followed by a conclusion.
To embark upon, technology has undoubtedly blessed the entire world with feasibility which makes it positive for certain population. Due to its effect on various aspects of life, human being is now able to drive a car on smooth roads. Also, he can communicate with his loved ones from anywhere. Furthermore, its contribution towards the entertainment is absolutely impeccable as now we are able to watch movies or listen to great music etc. Although, there are innumerable benefits of globalisation but few of the aforestated examples are more than enough to prove this point.
Conversely, the contrary side of the coin reveals its pernicious impact on our planet i.e. pollution resulting in "Global Warming". Because of the monumental use of vehicles and misuse of nuclear power, the temperature of the Earth is rising incessantly which is quite dreadful. Consequently, a slew of natural calamities are occurring frequently such as Earthquake, Draught, Flood and Tornado etc. For instance, recently Nepal was devastated by a powerful Earthquake which not only shattered the whole country but also costed thousands of lives. Plus, the quality of food, air and water is perishing slowly and demands expedite redressal.
To recapitulate, I would like to mention assertively that the drawbacks of globalisation far outweigh any positive repercussions. In fact, we must pay attention towards the deadly warning signals before it gets too late. Hence, we all should unite and protest against this injustice to nature and must start afforestation on a larger scale as well. Additionally, the government of all nations must enforce certain rules to limit the use of conveyances. Our mutual efforts can save this incredible planet.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, for instance, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20809248555 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0523351128 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667630057803 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0076656873 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106369327713 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0249071920559 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370626964567 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.054749952255 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168420148413 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.