Examine the moderating role of spiritual leadership in the relationship between intellectual capital and organizational excellence in the public agencies in Iranshahr
Nowadays, the loyalty of client is an achievement key for banks. If the loyalty of customer rises up, the quota of a market and the amount of bank profit will increase. According to the mentioned definitions, the goal of this thesis is investigating the role of spiritual leadership relating to intellectual capital and organizational skills in the administrative system of IRANSHAHR province in 1396. The statistical population is including of IRANSHAHR administration employees (approximately 700 people). According to Cronbach formula, the number of people that they are chosen as the sample is 234 people And the number of questionnaires for analyzing is 270. Three different questionnaires have used for gathering data that those are named spiritual leadership, intellectual capital, and organizational skills with having KRONBAKH alpha factors as below: 00.933, 0.925, 0.940 respectively. The AMOS software has used for hypothesizes analyzing. The results have shown that the spiritual leadership variable in the relationship between intellectual capital and organizational skills has an equalizer role and spiritual leadership reduces the severity of this relationship. the spiritual leadership variable significantly reduces the impact of organizational skills on relationship capital. Also, the variable of spiritual leadership in the relationship between the dimensions of intellectual capital (relational capital, human capital and structural capital) and organizational skills has an equalizer role only in the relation between relationship capital and organizational skills.Other results of the test have shown that the organizational skills variable has a mediator role in the relationship between spiritual leadership and intellectual capital.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage. 56
- Your friend has the opportunity to choose either one of two types of majors (fields of study), which one of the following two majors do you think is a better choice, and why?– A major that would allow him to finish years of study and get a degree sooner 73
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some un 81
- Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes. Other believe that going p classes should be optional. Which point of view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer. 76
- TPO 43- integrated writing 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 825, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l, and organizational skills with having KRONBAKH alpha factors as below: 00.933,...
^^
Line 1, column 1177, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...uces the severity of this relationship. the spiritual leadership variable significa...
^^^
Line 1, column 1585, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Other
...nship capital and organizational skills.Other results of the test have shown that the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04819277108 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54852856362 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 176.041082164 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465863453815 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 115.136614506 49.4020404114 233% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 150.6 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 7.06120827912 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404442993839 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147465416207 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162958750015 0.0667982634062 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.404442993839 0.151304729494 267% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.11 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.