Facing penalties for not on time children
Recently, the phenomenon of penalty for delayed assignment and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that facing fixed punishment is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that introducing a heavy penalty can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, imposing a minimum penalty on overdue assignments can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of introducing a fixed penalty on not on time assignments and developing the literacy rate are inextricably bound up. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between to be exactly on time and imposing minimum penalties as well as an exponential increase in the academic success. Thus, beneficial ramifications of imposing a minimum penalty for belated assignments apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychology, facing severe penalties on belated assignments for children might augment the consequences of educational backwardness. Moreover, fundamental aspects of introducing penalties for children could relate to this reality that the demerits of scientific retardation pertain to imposing severe penalties. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of heavy penalty is correlated negatively with mental retardation in children. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of improving chronically late kids.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of imposing appropriate punishment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of imposing minimum penalty prove the significance of being on time, but also pinpoint diligence and indolence management implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79461279461 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31301154967 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8815573478 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.416666667 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363016950238 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119244671889 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844260454542 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190401383976 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825599056498 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.