The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads. Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
From the inception of human existence, humans have always tried to make their life more comfortable. While they have already discovered myriads of transportation options, but still, due to scarcity of natural resources, there is a room for growth. Whether different forms of transportation options should be encouraged or not, while making a standard practice of law globally, with car ownership and utilization, is a moot topic. I strongly agreed with the former notion and will elucidate further to support this point with required arguments and illustrations.
There are a myriad of reasons, but the most preponderant one is lack of natural resources. As we all know, nature gave us its beautiful things like air, water, crude oil etc, to consume it without spending a single penny but unluckily, it is having limited quantity. However, if we use all of them for private use like private cars, it will not only affect mother nature, but also will increase the consumption of resources. Consequently, it will affect nature with more pollution. Alternatively, governments must come forward and promote different forms of transport in order to use natural resources maximally.
Another pivotal aspect to save our planet with different forms of transportation is that, there must be some standard rules for vehicle ownership and use of private means of transportation, across the globe. Government must develop a transport system like there should not be use of private mode of transport required. On the other hand, residents must pay a huge levy to the government, for keeping more than one vehicle. One of the best examples is a country like Singapore which already designed the public transport system perfectly, where local residents never ever feel the pain of transportation just because of awesome feasible public transport options with all the best amenities. Another notion from my perspective is being a human we should also take responsibility and take care of this earth, with proper consumption of natural resources.
On the basis of the above discussed points, one can conclude that there must be standard rules across the globe to save mother and must be an international law to protect earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-18 | orphism | 89 | view |
| 2021-02-15 | DIEU PHUONG | 79 | view |
| 2020-10-04 | Rachana92 | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-18 | Shivangip | 84 | view |
| 2020-09-05 | ananddeepsingh | 84 | view |
- Does television remove loneliness or not 82
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Stress is now a major problem in many countries around the world What are some of the factors in modern society that cause this stress and how can we reduce it 84
- While taking an important decisions in a company the advice of lower level employees should be involved or not? 77
- Whether the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 548, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t this point with required arguments and illustrations. There are a myriad of...
^^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...nts and illustrations. There are a myriad of reasons, but the most preponderant o...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21848739496 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93177636167 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560224089636 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6068067446 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.2 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155373719486 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544752314286 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649554673827 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984435900701 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352020933058 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.