Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate the local food produced by farmers.
Nowadays, supermarkets are stocked wide range of products from all around the world. Some individuals believe that imported food have detrimental effect on economy and culture but other think that local food items are better option for local economy. According to my perception local food products help in local economy and environment but it limits the choices.
Firstly , the transported food from distant places makes the wide variety of food products. People can enjoy wide range of food items. To illustrate, about 10 years ago, Kiwi is fruit of New Zeeland is not as much famous but now it is on every stage of fruit shop. Secondly, by import of food items people get employment, farmers expand globally this leads to increase in the economy of the country. Hence, good relationship creates between the countries which helps international co-operation and peace.
On the downside, the huge amount of fossil fuel burned to transport food to one place to another it leads to damage to environment. The massive reduction in oil consumption if prefer the local food products. The food products available in local market are highly nutritious because these are plucked from tree when they are ripened, these are fresh and free from preservatives. In contrast imported foods are plucked when they are raw and preserve them with the help of chemicals. It effects the nutrient value of the eatables. The regular consumption leads to health issues.
To summarize, if people give preference to local producer it will be beneficial for health, environment and local economy. Even so consume only local food is not viable option it lower the choices to eat the variety of stuff.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-09 | Joel James | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-25 | kaushik7373 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | kamal_rose96@yahoo.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | kamal_rose96@yahoo.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | maryam.m.v | 73 | view |
- Some People prefer online classes while others think that it is better to be in a traditional classroom Discuss both sides and give your opinion 51
- Nowadays, the internet and television have given ordinary people a chance to become famous. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- The education a child receives at home from having parents who are positive role models is more important than the academic education a child receives at school To what extend do you agree or disagree 81
- Some people believe that there will be a reduction in air travel in the future. Do you think that this trend is a positive or negative development? 73
- Some people believe that to be successful at a sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... but it limits the choices. Firstly , the transported food from distant place...
^^
Line 9, column 383, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...e fresh and free from preservatives. In contrast imported foods are plucked when they ar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 180, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lowers', 'lows'?
Suggestion: lowers; lows
...only local food is not viable option it lower the choices to eat the variety of stuff...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, even so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1231884058 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65580826117 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4514268754 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.375 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360014915161 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104236820795 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886836522536 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21894223256 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662730176895 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.