Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate the local food produced by farmers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a true fact that people should buy locally grown or produced food rather than imported food because it helps to boost local economy and also helpful to environment. Although many may see it as a positive phenomenon, it is not a trend without drawbacks. Both merits and demerits will be discussed before a reasonable conclusion is reached.
The first and foremost advantage is that it helps to the betterment of society. In other word, if public buys only traditional food such as vegetables, fruits, packed food and so on, the taxes on this item go directly to local states. These taxes use for development and it ultimately benefits society.
The second advantage is that the local people get cheaper food than that comes from another place because locally produced food does not require any transportation. Moreover, vehicle, flights and so on are a large producer of green-house gases and this result in global warming. However, Due to the least transportation use in local food, there is no harm in the environment.
On the other hand, the use of local food also has a negative aspect. People cannot get variation in food. So, after eating local food, they may be developed a tolerance of taste. This result in a decreased demand for local food. For example, a recent survey conducted by an eminent food blogger David Mosely at the United States revealed that if people eat same food continuous for 20 days, more than 40 % people get saturated from that food and never eat that food again.
After analysing both the views, I am of the opinion that there are more benefits of using local food than their drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
...d also helpful to environment. Although many may see it as a positive phenomenon, it is ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83214285714 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.608839491 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.369154637 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325292948258 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111057859928 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756174936853 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176426679789 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733458266117 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.