Foreign Tourists must be charged higher fees that local people to visit cultural places and historical sites. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion including relevant examples.
Countries and cities have multiple visiting places that the tourists are charged for, depending upon the place and its area that it surrounds. This essay will discuss the argument if the fee should be charged more from the foreign people.
One of the most important factors why foreign tourists must be charged more is for the development of the tourist places everywhere. For example, a country like India has several historical monuments and tourist places and a huge portion of the funds come in through the visitors. This money inflow helps the authorities to maintain and develop the places. As an illustration, the famous Taj Mahal has been able to gain a lot of tourist attention since ages. In addition to the beauty of the Taj Mahal, one would find that even the entrance and the lawn area is well maintained and tidy. The national parks would be another instance, where a lot of cash inflow is required to maintain the park as well as feed the animals and provide proper facilities. There would be a considerable decrease in funds if foreign tourists are charged the same as the locals.
The locals, on the other hand, usually do not visit the places very often. Being in the same city, they do not prefer re-visiting the same places, and hence charging them higher would not really help in any way. Secondly, some small amount that foreign tourists pay gets multiplied and converts to a bigger amount in local currency. To illustrate, 10 dollars for a US tourist would be INR <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">600 </span> in India and hence it somewhat benefits both the parties. This, however, does not apply to every combination of the country but is a beneficial factor.
To conclude, tourists from foreign countries should not be charged unreasonably more. Nevertheless, the price should be relatively higher than what is charged to locals if one wants to focus on the development of the cultural and historical places.
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other oldpeople where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government hasto pay for this care.Who should be responsible for our old people? 61
- Consumers nowadays are faced with increased advertising from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by these advertisements? What measures can be taken to tackle this issue 73
- Some people prefer to work for a large company.Others prefer to work for a small company. Which would you prefer?Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 56
- Which way do you prefer to spend time: with a small number of close friends or with many friends?Compare these two views. 73
- In some countries people spend a lot of money on their pets They buy special food for their cats or dogs buy them toys and often pay high fees for medical treatment Some people think this is a waste of time What are the advantages and disadvantages of hav 31
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arged more from the foreign people. One of the most important factors why fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are charged the same as the locals. The locals, on the other hand, usually d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96646341463 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82947197543 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7670176488 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8125 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275172346663 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928264688823 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592647166073 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183580242458 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251810682294 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.