In the future, it may be necessary for us to live on another planets. For this reason, some people believe that we should spend money now researching planets that could be a possible home such as mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, it is considering that living on other planets, for example mars, may be necessary for us in the upcoming era. Therefore, some people argued that money should be spent to research this planet because these could be our future possible homes. From my perspective, I completely disagree with given statement because it could be waste of money.
In a way, technology is rising fast all over the world. People have been able to reach everywhere with the assistance of it. But, on the behind of this success, huge amount of money and different sorts of human resources are being used. We all know that research on the planets is not easy work because different type of equipment has to be collected before starting investigation which takes long period to be collected. But, despite the collection of this equipment, the result may be seen as an unsuitable planet for human living. Consequently, it is just a loss of money and human resources.
Secondly, Physical materials and natural resources are used in the planetary research. The raw materials are used to make equipment. For example, Iron is widely used to make rockets. Also, various gases are used effectively, that can affect the earth. Due to widely use of natural resources in researching planets, the world should bound to accept the lack of these resources which lead to crises and environmental problems in the society.
In conclusion, spending wide amount of money in an investigation of planets can lead to problems of lack of natural resources and this seems like a waste of money and human resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-28 | anoj adhikari | 73 | view |
- Nowadays creations of technology such as robots are using rapidly all over the world What do you think does these development have more advantage or disadvantage 78
- Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 33
- In a numbers of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sum of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities others believe that money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss these bo 67
- In the future it may be necessary for us to live on another planets For this reason some people believe that we should spend money now researching planets that could be a possible home such as mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96226415094 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76144435716 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554716981132 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7887015936 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333845003629 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988857707412 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100563127316 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199808439775 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143556490604 0.056905535591 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.