In the future it may be necessary for us to live on other planets For this reason some people believe that we should spend money now to research other planets such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree

Nowadays, It is often argued that there are plenty of issues occurring on our planet that is increasingly harsh to settle. While I believe that it is vital to tackle this problem, I firmly concur with this given notion.

There are two primary reasons why life on the Earth is becoming unsustainable. One of the main factors is the overconsumption of natural resources, especially non-renewable resources. Consequently, the exceed exploitation leads to a scarcity of minerals that is significantly required for construction and manufacture. Unfortunately, natural resources are unable to restore as no research methods have been done to reform such resources. Additionally, the ample amount of disposal waste discharged to rivers and land. This kind of waste directly impacts the environment and ecosystem, and it gives rise to severe serious problems such as global warming and climate change that are threatening our mother Earth day-by-day.
However, spending finances on finding another planet for survival might be a new home for humankind is truly unrealistic at present. Presently, studies have shown that there is no other planet like ours to sustain human life. Plus, there has been no clue of living organisms found on other planets. Moreover, not all individuals will able to bear the cost of survival on planets like Mars. Therefore, the government should focus on finding realistic solutions for living on Earth instead of funding space research organizations.

In conclusion, although the environment on our planet is getting harmful, there are numerous solutions to sustain and preserve the environment and make it healthier for mankind.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... non-renewable resources. Consequently, the exceed exploitation leads to a scarcity of min...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43798449612 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06231232003 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624031007752 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7718420445 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.214285714 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234594831837 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660318150294 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460278992517 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121507959071 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070075523932 0.056905535591 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.