In the future it may be necessary for us to live on other planets. For this reason, some people believe that we should spend money now to research other planets, such as Mars.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It says that probably humankind will be forced to conquer a new frontier such as other planets. That is why some individuals have an opinion that people should allocate funds for the exploration of other planets. I somewhat disagree with this idea because society should concentrate on the improvement of life on Earth first.
It is true that fundamental researches of outer space should be conducted. However, this kind of works is highly expensive and demands a lot of work and dedication. Meanwhile, modern humanity is facing serious ecological issues, which have to be solved as soon as possible. For instance, if we do not take action immediately, we will end up with an ecological catastrophe. Even today a large number of countries around the globe have an extremely high level of air, water, and soil pollution. That is why the government should first tackle the mentioned above issues and only after solving them, it is feasible to spend money on cosmic research.
In addition, rocket launching might be the cause of radioactive pollution in the area of a spaceport, which would result in health problems related to it. Unfortunately, scientists did not find an alternative to the rocket fuel yet. In my opinion, scientific society should focus on it as the primary task and leave outer space research for the future. In fact, if humanity addresses all modern problems and funds them first, it will not be necessary to live on other planets because we will have a thriving and clean planet where everyone will have everything for happy and fulfilled lives.
In conclusion, even though I think that some research of outer space might be useful, I disagree that authorities should sponsor them, as other social and ecological problems should be tackled as matter of urgency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the improvement of life on Earth first. It is true that fundamental researches o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...h an ecological catastrophe. Even today a large number of countries around the globe have an extr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hing for happy and fulfilled lives. In conclusion, even though I think that so...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01677852349 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73967138327 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577181208054 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8164566391 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.785714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284504464664 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851852854935 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627808370458 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173778521731 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278950973135 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.