In general, PEOPLE do not have such a CLOSE RELATIONSHIP with their NEIGHBOURS as they did in the PAST. WHY is this so, and what can be DONE to IMPROVE CONTACT between neighbours?
It is undeniable fact that the lives of people in this contemporary world have become more isolated as compared to the past. The burgeoning effects of urbanisation and mobility of work are the main causes of this problem. However, by organizing social events and inviting neighbours to get-togethers can improve relationship contact with them.
To embark on, there are a number of reasons for the substantial decrease in the development of a healthy relationship with the people living next-to doors. The first and foremost is the surge in urban development which has made the life of an individual modern and sedentary. This is because, people usually spend 9-10 hours at work in weekdays and remaining time they prefer to stay with family, consequently, leaving no time to interact with neighbours. Another crucial factor is the mobile lifestyle of people living in metropolitan areas. The reason for this is the globalisation, which has provided an ample number of employment opportunities, as a result, employees opt for new jobs and locations to avail higher packages. For instance, according to a survey by the Gurgaon Daily newspaper, 60% of the immigrants living in apartments in Gurgaon change their dwelling places two times on average, every year. Therefore, this leads to the less possibility of developing close relations with neighbours.
Some measures are required, in order, to ameliorate the connection of people living in the same localities. Primarily, the organisation of cultural and traditional events should be done in societies to bring the people of different cultures together. This further increases the respect for others and strengthens the bonds among them and leads to a close relationship. Next, although the life of an individual is busy, an initiative at their end is also required to build contact with the ones living near-by. Additionally, invitations to personal function such as birthday parties, marriage anniversaries, can be given for developing a friendship.
In conclusion, two of the main causes of less closeness among neighbours include modern-busy city culture and frequent relocation of living places. Nevertheless, this relation can be be made stronger by socialising and sharing cultures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-02 | Prabhjot Kaur Bhullar | 84 | view |
- Should young people follow older people s advice or is it good for them to challenge older people s opinions and thoughts Discuss both views and give your own opinion 57
- These days many children spend a lot of their time playing computer games but little time doing sports Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 60
- SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT THE BEST WAY TO IMPROVE PUBLIC HEALTH IS BY INCREASING THE NUMBER OF SPORTS FACILITIES. OTHERS, HOWEVER, SAY THAT THIS WOULD HAVE LITTLE EFFECT ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND THAT OTHER MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN 73
- You have recently read an article in the newspaper about someone you know personally. You found that some information is wrong.Write a letter to the editor to inform him about it. In your letter, write:•what the article is about•what the error is•wh 81
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 181, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: be
...places. Nevertheless, this relation can be be made stronger by socialising and sharin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4245014245 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11238142355 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575498575499 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4307058997 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269245185852 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776311562684 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531159546153 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169332242887 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466128922909 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.