Globalization has many post effects on world's economy but the negative effects of it cannot be forgotten
Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.
It can be seen that, globalization is incessantly augmenting which has ample of benefits go world's economy as well as myriad of drawbacks too. Although, local economy can be collapsed due to globalization, I believe that, increase trades between nations is one of the pivotal positive effects.
On the one hand, globalization can be a cardinal obstacle for indigenous market to do business. That is to say that, when one country procured the things at cheaper rate from another country nations, the price of that particular product would eventually decrease which would utterly make an negative impact on vernacular market. Consequently, local businessmen and shop-keepers would be on egregious situation that they would face humongous loss on terms of money and local market would gradually be crashed. For example, every year India imports plethora of products from China due to which local markets are facing numerous adversities. However, I believe that, positive implications of globalization has an upper hand.
On the other hand, business between two nations would be upsurged due to globalization. This is because, multinational companies would set-up their branches mostly in developing countries which would considerably flourish that country esspecially in terms of health and education. As a result, not only the employment rate will go higher but relations between two nations will also be changed in positive manner. To illustrate, recently a multinational company named Monte Carlo has brought it's set-up to India and try to create employment as well as helped to change other sectors. Hence, the argument is substantiated that, globalization has aplenty of positive effects.
In conclusion, local markets can be affected negatively due to globalization whereas business would be created between two nations because of globalization. So, I believe that globalization has positive implications on world's economy and it is recommended that, every government should grab the benefits of globalization to develop rapidly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | VishvAdthakkar | 73 | view |
- Many people try to look younger than their age. What are the causes people do this? Do you think this is a good thing or bad thing? 61
- Some people think that watching sport is wastage of time during leisure time. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicines. Government funding should reflect this.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Crime is a problem all over the world and there is nothing that can be done to prevent it Do you agree or disagree with the statement 81
- Some parents buy and allow their children anything they as or want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have on children as they grow older? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ually decrease which would utterly make an negative impact on vernacular market. C...
^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...balization has positive implications on worlds economy and it is recommended that, eve...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, so, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56591639871 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13548187289 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536977491961 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.520110294 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.642857143 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113300730645 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487646020547 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408894155123 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920969345784 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497978766339 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.