The topic of traffic congestion is a very important concern for society at the moment. Government is trying to find a way to reduce traffic congestion. The way that provide free public transportation contributes reducing traffic congestion is one of alternatives.
We should start by taking a look at expense of transportations that the government must need to pay. It is good idea that government provide free public transportations for 24/7. Because it will be caused more commuters and citizens to use transportation instead of take their individual cars and congestion will be reduced. Nonetheless, it would be covered by taxes and if more residents take transportation, expense will increase by chance. Also, there is a chance to argue by tax payers.
Turning to the second point view, it is helpful to the environment. The environmental pollution is caused by various reasons. One of various reasons can be the cars. For instance, Seoul, Capital city of South Korea, provided free transportation for a day for better quality of air. As a result, 2 times citizens used transportations than usual and air pollution was improved. Therefore, the government provide complimentary service that public transportations encourage using public transportation to citizens and make more interest from commuters.
In conclusion, both arguments have strong arguments. The environment is not seen our eyes but definitely benefit to every single of us. Therefore, I totally agree with that government encourage using transportation by complimentary if government provide proper time schedule and can support enough financial.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38226196502 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5249472269 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8823529412 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7058823529 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276414499746 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865944779062 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108021558357 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16920331081 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640707841426 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.