I am Mary from south local community. I am writing this letter to complain regarding to the problems of this museum.
Our local museum is one of our city historical tourist spots, in which we are proud of. So, plenty of people from other cities visit and tour the museum. I’ve noticed that this museum has some problems for disabled people. I’ve invited my friend who is older and not able to look around without a wheelchair to our city and visit this museum last weekend. I felt it was uncomfortable to get around. Firstly, the descriptions are located to high for people in wheelchairs and children. My friend couldn’t read all of the information and needed my help to understand every piece of art. Secondly, there was no access for wheelchairs to short-cut movie section because of the stairs.
I suggest you solve these problems and make the descriptions lower, so all people can read it and remove the stairs. If you consider my opinions, It would be helpful for the museum.
Sincerely,
Mary
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Is this good or bad thing. 61
- Government is going to provide free public transportation facilities 24/7 to reduce the traffic congestion. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people feel that robots are very important to humans future development while others think they are dangerous and have negative effects on the society Discuss both views and give your own opinion 57
- Government is going to provide free public transportation facilities 24/7 to reduce the traffic congestion. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 56
- Government is going to provide free public transportation facilities 24 7 to reduce the traffic congestion To what extend do you agree or disagree 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 524, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... children. My friend couldn't read all of the information and needed my help to under...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 32.9175257732 70% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 26.3917525773 87% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 937.175257732 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 206.0 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82285714286 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68573860171 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 127.690721649 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617142857143 0.622605031667 99% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 290.88556701 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 16.3608247423 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8816227602 44.8134815571 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.3333333333 76.5299724578 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5833333333 16.8248392259 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 4.34317383033 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128943643898 0.216113520407 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044133037938 0.0766984524023 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375679601728 0.0603063233224 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094530136185 0.12726935374 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133535445285 0.0580467560999 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 8.37731958763 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 70.7449484536 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 7.45979381443 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 8.71597938144 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 7.59969072165 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 41.2886597938 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 8.62886597938 64% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 8.54432989691 89% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.