The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
It is frequently argued that the government should fund public services rather than allocating funds to the arts. Although I agree that government investments in public services play a very vital role, I believe that sufficient support for the art sector is also essential for the society.
On the one hand, the government should certainly invest a significant portion of its spending to providing public services. This industry system determines the general standard of living by making sure that some fundanmental constructions, including roads, schools, and hospitals are able to use for all the residents regardless of their level of income or social standing. Public services provide for the basic necessities of society and as a result, they require enough fuding. For this reason, the government should initially fund public services sufficiently.
On the other hand, given that art can satisfy people's spiritual needs, the argument that spending money on the arts is wasteful on the budget is absurd. Aesthetic and entertaining purposes are served by the art, which enable individuals to experience spiritual and aesthetic pleasure. Seeing calligraphy and paintings works in an art exhibition or listen to a concert offers people priceless opportunity to relax and even find inspiration to solve problems if they are experiencing stress due to some significant challenges at work.
All in all, the arts industry is crucial to society and shouldn't be disregarded.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | butterflyluo | 56 | view |
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 80
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
- some university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects Others feel it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...anding. Public services provide for the basic necessities of society and as a result, they requir...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
... challenges at work. All in all, the arts industry is crucial to society and shou...
^^^^
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...arts industry is crucial to society and shouldnt be disregarded.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4347826087 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95350229446 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626086956522 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9099300639 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288624265386 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116853273025 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960098181497 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153762892686 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107474428522 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.