Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Apropos to the modern era, mode of transports have undergone tremendous changes and have eased human race to extreme extent. Yearly, a heavy chunk of annual budget is reserved for transport sector. However, I am in consumate accord with this pragmatic concept that enormous budget oriented notions and strategies should be adopted by higher authorities. In order to flourish and and advance railway department rather than roads to mitigate rising commuting problems faced by citizens.
Railway is one of the relic transportation media and have incubated with this advancing technology oriented world. It is one of the fastest travelling source, aiding passengers to reach their desired destination within minutes. In contrast, travelling through roads consumes a lot of time due to traffic jams and costs higher because every citizen has to own his personal vehicle. In addition, trains are the most convenient and affordable forms of travelling despite of roads due to low maintenance and insurance costs. For instances, in recent conducted research computerised trams have found to be the utmost priority of commuters rather than cars. Nevertheless, the long lasting benefits associated with railways have helped curbing the dilemma of overcrowding vehicles in downtowns.
Economy of different countries have been immensely flourished due to huge investment in train sector worldwidely. Furthermore, it is the widely used source of public transport across globe linked with heavy income and hence the profit can be ploughed back in to the concerning department. Moreover, it has less detrimental effects on environment due to the fact of low rate of gas emission leading to a downfall in air and noise pollution. Inevitably, this results in positive effects on health of individuals and decreasing mortality and morbidity rate. On the other hand it is said that soon road infrastructure will become redundant and train infrastructure will reach to its extreme fames.
In conclusion, in order to cope with the modernizing world higher authorities should dedicate greater percentage of annual budget for public transport modes such as trains. This will help states in curbing pollution issues, help in developing thriving economy and promote use of public transport among citizens. Ultimately, ploughing back benefits in order to strengthen the economic position of country.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | ermukesh09 | 73 | view |
2020-01-23 | aghalandar | 78 | view |
2020-01-21 | Amarpreet Singh | 78 | view |
2020-01-19 | haseebkhan | 78 | view |
2020-01-16 | Vicky Kachhadiya | 61 | view |
- in many countries the level of crime is increasing and crimes are becoming more violent.Why do you think this is and what can be done about it?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience.Write at least 250 words. 89
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole.Discuss this view and give your own opinion 73
- In some countries in Europe, some children from the age of 11 or 13 go to schools to learn more practical skills that will help them get a job. Other children stay in schools which provide a more general academic education.What should schools do to prepar 67
- The tendency for human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashions in clothes and other consumers goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In many cities today, most people live in large apartments. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages? 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 376, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...igher authorities. In order to flourish and and advance railway department rather than ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51366120219 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93898151582 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614754098361 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1673411732 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.111111111 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61111111111 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119935188881 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353985929365 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393161349617 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074270167308 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374295958973 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.