A growing numbers of cities are making their centres pedestrian only zones What are the advantages and disadvantages

Population density forced the municipality officials to take some measures in order to control heavy traffics in the downtown. It is becoming increasingly popular among the cities to ban the commuting of any motorized vehicles. This argument has both advantages and disadvantages. This essay will analyze both sides before declaring a conclusion.

To begin with, a fair number of people claim that this trend can help reduce the amount of airborne pollutant in the air and have a healthier society. For instance, consider a car-free downtown without any fumes exhaustion can help us inhale less polluted air. Furthermore, this approach forces individuals to leave their sedentary lifestyle aside for a while and walk for some hours. Thus, this process is not only prosperous for the environment but also for the people by actuating them to do some exercises.

However, pedestrianisation of the downtown hubs may transfer traffic-congestion to the surrounding areas and also relocating of business centers. For example, as the number of passersby decrease due to its accessibility, then many stores like to go to the crowded places in order to increase their income. As a matter of fact, this trend may transfer the traffic jams to the vicinity areas which cause irritation for people living there. Therefore, the prevention of vehicles into the city centers can incur some negative repercussions.

As mentioned aforesaid, the merits and drawbacks of this argument were examined. While, its merits override its negative consequences and it may be considered an Eco-friendly activity and is prosperous for people, its negative consequences should be mitigated. In conclusion, I hope that this kind of environmentally friendly activities will become prevalent in the foreseeable future.

Votes
Average: 2.6 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fumes'' or 'fume's'?
Suggestion: fumes'; fume's
...onsider a car-free downtown without any fumes exhaustion can help us inhale less poll...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a matter of fact, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45683453237 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18329065146 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625899280576 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.576711506 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.133333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0635515654516 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0229809985472 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265153002399 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0376612124004 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220578269001 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.