The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in town and cities closing. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, due to advancement in technology online shopping has become highly popular among the new generation all over the world. The author believes that the present day brick-and-mortar shops will cease to exist in future as a consequence of new online virtual stores. I agree with the above statement to a larger extent that soon it will take over the people’s mind-set for all sorts of needs.
First of all, the online shopping gives the customers a wide array of product options suiting to their taste and requirements. For instance, they can buy regular groceries and regular consumables by click of a button and receiving the product at their home in a given time frame. As a result, this will save a huge amount of time and resources spent by the person while going to hard-roof stores for their essential and non-essential needs. Moreover, if the products require return being defective or replacement due to damage, the request can be placed online and managed efficiently without much wastage of time.
Secondly, the e-shops will be able to provide a better price band for any shortlisted product from various brands or manufacturers under one roof, which seems difficult with physical stores. The customer has to visit the multiple shops and spend a lot of time to finalise the item he is looking for. In a recent survey conducted in a Metro City, it has been observed that people spend 2 hours a day and at least 2 litres of fuel to go to various shops and stores. This leads to an excessive wastage of time and resources which otherwise could be saved for other productive purposes. While the online shopping not only saves the time, but also the resources by clubbing the multiple deliveries in a go, thus reducing the overall cost of a transaction.
Therefore, the online shopping is going to be a better preposition for buyers and sellers in the near future for all type of goods including large appliances and equipment. The above representations are sufficient enough to justify the argument.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, at least, for instance, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90379008746 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76829181143 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577259475219 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3964451466 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226388594731 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804593663985 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544425896989 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143094838694 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587211885154 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.