Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is an undeniable truth of today’s time that numerous poverty-stricken countries are in dire need of financial assistance from economically developed nations. To such an extent that, they do not have access to basic necessities of livelihood, such as, food, shelter, and medicine. Therefore, I staunchly support that, one of the fundamental responsibilities of developed nations is to support and uplift lesser developed ones’.
Although, it is the case that super powers of the globe have been giving financial aid to the countries who need them. However, the ways and amounts that are required are marginal to suffice their needs. The USA, for instance, have been rendering financial support to Democratic Republic of Congo, but still, it is rated to have maximum illiteracy and worst medical facilities. Therefore, along with financial support, they must also assist them to better utilize the funds. For example, they can use the money to build new industries, which, indeed can boost their economy and well-being of the nation.
The global economic crisis, on the other hand, has recently impacted all the major economies and resulted in down-sizing the aid towards the needy societies. This, I believe, is not a positive approach. Rather, in such difficult times, developed countries must take along lesser developed nations by better utilizing their natural and human resources. China, for instance, has been investing colossal amounts in many African countries by initiating various infrastructure projects for the mutual economic benefit. The recent, CPEC (China Pakistan Economic Corridor) has proven to be a great success providing a plethora of jobs and money to poor people of Pakistan.
From the above argument, it can be concluded that food, education, and medical assistance are everyone’s right. Therefore, developed countries must beyond any doubt, attend to poorer nations. More importantly, apart from mere financial support, they must invest on people by assisting them in setting up industries and by educating their future generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | vahid57 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Rav Mander | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | bhatvishal@ | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-24 | azhar46 | 78 | view |
| 2018-04-05 | unicor01 | 61 | view |
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job. 89
- Today more people are travelling than ever before. Why is this the case? What are the benefits of travelling for the traveler? 73
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects Others say it causes the loss of national identities 79
- In many countries the tradition of families having meals together is disappearing. Why is this happen? What will be the effects of it to the family and to the society? 84
- Obesity is a serious problem in many countries especially in rich countries Discuss ways to solve the problem Provide specific reasons and examples to support your answer 21
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...extent that, they do not have access to basic necessities of livelihood, such as, food, shelter, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... uplift lesser developed ones'. Although, it is the case that super powers of th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, apart from, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.515625 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95367719705 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584375 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0294475915 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.3125 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15877513862 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473782699379 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457915723177 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932109640844 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249223244422 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.