The new areas should be discovered around the world from where there is more access to natural resources like oils and gases as the number of demands of such resources has been increased globally in recent years. In my opinion, discovering the areas of natural resources could be beneficial in many aspects.
Firstly, people always want to live in places where the resources available are more in order to make their lives easier. People make use of oils like petrol and gases like CNG daily in transportation. The availability of these resources at any place makes it possible for people to start living in that area. For instance, talking about petrol pumps, if we come to find out the place where there is a natural oil i.e. petrol is present, people will start living in that area and also will explore more about that place.
Furthermore, the discovery of oils and gas in an undiscovered area helps in the economical condition of the country. With the finding of natural resources in such places, one could establish a company that makes use of these resources. Establishing a company means the people in that area have the opportunity to work in that company and earn money. As a result, people's employment will increase.
Finally, plenty of researches are going on debating that only 20 percent have been discovered by the date. So, by exploring the new area the percentage of natural resources present could be increased.
In conclusion, the government should allow oils and gas companies to explore and start production in an undiscovered area as it has plenty of benefits like life in a new area, employability increases e.t.c.
- Prevention is better than cure Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures To what extent do you agree 68
- With the increased global demand in oil and gas undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources To what extent do you agree 61
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, talking about, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91366906475 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71807282462 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514388489209 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1311888416 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.076923077 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259211513624 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09398478417 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904390644099 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156641184936 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891693541579 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.