There is no doubt that the growing population and city centers are occupying natural beauty lands. Preserving these areas helps to make the city pollution-free and attracts tourists towards it. Regulatory measures can be used to safeguard natural resources. In the next two paragraphs, I will discuss the uses of saving beautiful places and actions to take for the same.
First of all, any country is known for its greenery and environment. These factors are the center of attraction for tourism and it is revenue of the nation. For instance, New Zealand is known for its picturesque views and there are hoards of tourists visiting every year. Moreover, maintaining green land keeps the environment free from carbon emissions which is further advantageous to the health of the public.
There are numerous ways to save breath-taking places in any country. Government is a major player here as it can pass various strict laws against the defaulters. There should be a restriction on building malls or houses on green land by the government. Also, laws can be passed against increasing population by putting a limit of one child per family so that there is a limited need to build more houses.
To conclude, shielding natural spots is helpful in a pollution-free environment and evolving tourism. Stringent laws can be used to protect these areas. This would help to become country rich and attractive.
- With increasing populations and ever growing urban centres many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What are benefits of protecting places for natural beauty spots How can it be solved 56
- Some schools start teaching a foreign language in primary school years Do advantages of teaching languages to young children outweigh the disadvantages Give your own opinion and examples 73
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it 78
- Schools do not do enough to teach students about their health. Do you agree or disagree with this statement. 84
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, for instance, no doubt, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07359307359 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84405371208 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627705627706 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3075176509 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.1333333333 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235222682225 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702653421823 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569063260987 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130915071793 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600017796579 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.