International tourism has become a huge industry in the world. Do the problems of international travel outweigh its advantages?
Globalization and advancements in technology are two main roots of international tourism where globalization stands for free travel across the globe and technology provides the basis for planning and executing travel itineraries. However, tourism has become a cause of concern for most of the countries because of the destructive habits of some tourists and other environmental issues. Even though tourism is a good source of revenue for some countries around the globe but what comes with it should not be ignored. I believe the negatives that come with tourism outweigh its benefits.
To begin with, one of the main problems that come with tourism is the hapless habits of some individuals like littering, Breaking traffic laws, creating unnecessary chaos, etc. Moreover, some people do the hunting, fishing which is quite harmful to natural habitat and may lead to endangerment of some species. For e.g. India Government in 2013 banned plastic bags and containers is most of the states due to excessive littering by tourists.
Secondly, another main reason to explain this problem is the disruption of natural climate which has devastating effects on humans as well as aquatic life. The best way to explain this can be deforestation which is widespread throughout the globe. This practice is being done to make room for tourists during their stay in order to construct hotels, resorts and developing artificial sights for their attention. For e.g. In 2008 in Dublin a natural lake was destroyed in order to construct a huge resort with waterfront for international tourists.
All things considered, tourism can be a prime source of income for any particular nation but this benefit cannot outweigh the problems that come with it. Whereas, from my personal point of view I believe that all international tourists should abide by the laws of any particular nation they are planning to visit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | Karan.gulati07 | 67 | view |
- These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas, in the past, people used to repair damaged things and keep them for a long time.Explain why you think this change has happened. What are the effects of this change in attitude? 56
- Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework?Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Most societies have homeless people. Some people think that the best way to help them is to give them money.To what extent do you agree? 78
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them?Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The crime rate, in most countries, is often higher in urban areas than in rural areas.Why do you think that is?What can be done to reduce the crime rate? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...utweigh the problems that come with it. Whereas, from my personal point of view I belie...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24509803922 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84137876653 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578431372549 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4300135875 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.461538462 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183911212927 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630536178633 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524663710662 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106642566889 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05206625424 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.