The internet has changed the way we communicate Much communication today happens through social media Some people support this and think it is a positive development Others believe that social media have negative effects

Essay topics:

The internet has changed the way we communicate. Much communication today happens through social media. Some people support this and think it is a positive development. Others believe that social media have negative effects.

The Internet became one of the crucial aspects of our communication. Most of us today cannot think of socialization without social media. Some people reward the benefits of this development however the others claim that this change in our communication will have drastic effects on face-to-face interactions. This essay will discuss both approaches and provide relevant examples.
Firstly, the Internet makes long distances short and brings people together who live far away from each other. It is often said that students living abroad are feeling much better when they can speak with their family at any time they want through video calls. Moreover, in pandemic times, many people have to live isolated in their homes, and the only way to connect to close ones was by calling them and organizing online video conferences. Researchers stated that 75 percent of social communication happened throughout the Internet in times of strict lockdown in 2020. This means that we benefitted immensely from the internet.
On the other hand, there are ongoing debates over the negative aspects of the Internet. It is maybe true that video calls made life easier, however social media usage remarkably increased in recent years, and this brought the question of how constructive our communication. For Instance, There are many fake accounts on social media that comment on the pictures that people share and in some cases, those comments happened to have discouraging content that affects people's lives intrinsically. Recent research from Oxford University reveals that social media dislikes have destructive results on teenager's social development.
In essence, It is clear that the internet has created a new way of communication and this brought side effects alongside it. In my opinion, this new way creates advancements and it should be seen as an addition and variety to socialization rather than seeing as eliminating other options. Furthermore, vulnerable groups like children should be taught to use the internet mindfully.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-05-17 Ayse Nur 84 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, for instance, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37421383648 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81854523171 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62893081761 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7182076754 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.8125 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452758895776 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122961052469 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776466414983 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245877246061 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715714987104 0.056905535591 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.