It is believed that children from countries with a high level of unemployment should be offered just with a primary education and should not be offered with a secondary education as anyways they will not get a job in the future.
Do you agree or disagree?
There are biased opinions whether offspring from developing or underdeveloped nations ought to be offered only with primary education and should not be encouraged for university education as they will not be able to get employment in the future. However, I agree that children ought to be offered an opportunity to attend secondary because certain skills like thinking ability and problem solving learned in university tries to curb the problems of unemployment and helps to make a better society. My opinion is reasoned out by arguments and examples in subsequent paragraphs
The first and foremost reason why I support the view of offering children an option to attend secondary education is learning vivid vital skills apart from academics. By this, I mean university teaches various aspects like how to tackle the problematic situations and how to use the basic fundamental know-how acquired during primary education. For instance, according to a recent survey in northern India of people between 28-35, 65% of individuals agreed that university education equipped them with various skills and abilities which helped them to tackle difficult situations in life. As a result, secondary educated children are in a better position to tackle and think logically in various troubling situations in their life.
Another argument is that procuring secondary education helps offspring to become tolerant and respect other individuals. In other words, children who are university passed out have a better understanding and can think logically about the good and bad for society. For example, in most of the western developed countries, children are university passed out that helped a society not only by rendering their professional service but also by maintaining serene and peaceful atmosphere among people; thereby, having a crime-free and safe society.
However, there are a few vital aspects that can not be overlooked in favour of not offering children with secondary education. It must be admitted that nations with high unemployment have a shortage of funds and there are many other crucial aspects where it has to spend money for the betterment of citizens. But it must be taken into account that no nation can progress rapidly where children have just basic education, so having some funds for brighter children and encouraging them to attend secondary education is essential for faster progress of the nation.
To conclude, it can be commented that nations with higher unemployment ought to encourage brighter offspring to attend secondary education. I believe that it can help children not only with better skills and abilities but also make them a tolerant and understandable member of society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 576, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts and examples in subsequent paragraphs The first and foremost reason why I supp...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...r individuals. In other words, children who are university passed out have a better und...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t and understandable member of society.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, apart from, as to, for example, for instance, i mean, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2307.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 426.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41549295775 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86033417713 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483568075117 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 734.4 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5973131049 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.785714286 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320754948933 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121013701781 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102335678049 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188683081749 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101169794912 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.78957915832 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.