It is generally accepted that families are not as closed as they used to be. Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together.
Families are considered as backbone in everybody’s life. But, it is observed that people are more disconnected from their loved ones when it is compared to past. Obviously, people leave very busy life which can be a major reason behind this connection. So people have to understand the importance of family in one’s life and expected to put efforts to repair broken relationships.
To begin with, working culture in past when only a few members of family used to engage in work, leaving enough time to spend with families. However, now that most members of family are working due to increase in competitiveness for better living standards, people are working against the clock, resulting in insufficient time to bond with family. Less they communicate, more they feel disconnected and eventually left with broken relationships. Not only work kept them occupied, but many of them staying far away from the family and hardly get a chance to meet. Consequently, families are gradually contracting to small size.
Nevertheless, the best and most effective way to nurture any relationship is to communicate and spending time with loved ones by doing different recreational activities together, such as outing and picnics. For instance, having at least one meal together every day, initiates conversation that helps to create warmth relationship or regular phone calls and messages for people who are staying far away from their families. Additionally, children must be taught significance role of family that plays in individual life, from the early age in order to create meaningful bond in the long run. As it is said there is nothing broken beyond repair, same applies to family relationship if one understands its importance.
In Conclusion, although it is difficult provide sufficient time for family due to busy nature of life, It is not impossible. One has to set up his/her priorities to spend quality with family if he/she understands its significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | Surya Prakash | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | elham mousavi | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | Sinabri | 89 | view |
| 2018-06-25 | ajmeet | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-25 | sandip24 | 89 | view |
- Nowadays for many people the Internet is replacing regular books. What do you think will happen in the future and what is your opinion about this trend? 89
- Some people tell that to reduce traffic and pollution, government should increase the tax on the petrol (gasoline).Would there is more benefits than the drawback? 89
- Music should not be taught in schools instead other subjects, such as computer and science, should be taught. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Some people think that people who are over 60 years old should not work and retire earlier.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- You have recently employed a plumber to do a job at a place you renovating however something went wrong with the work that created a problem for your project Write a letter to the plumber and say What was the problem How can it be fixed Suggest how to app 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ommunicate and spending time with loved ones by doing different recreational activit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, as to, at least, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25949367089 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05195884835 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601265822785 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4488730694 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153228666835 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571165320449 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323637177748 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931337776758 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163227845214 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.