It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. DISCUSS and give your opinion.
It is true that some individuals, unlike others, may be gifted from birth with particular talents in some fields such as sports or music. While there is some truth in claiming that excellence in some sort of sports or music might belongs to natural aptitude, I am inclined to believe that guidance and dedication from an early age could create professional athletes and musicians.
On the one hand, a category people with outstanding performance in music or sports may have some biological factors that help them shine in their career life. To illustrate, factors like ethnic origin, as African American people who master in Olympics due to possessing a stronger muscle mass, or inherited musical ear, may contribute to developing special talents. As a result, part of individuals may excel in some fields if they were born with specific gifts.
On the other hand, I would side with those who suppose that talents could be acquired by continuous training and hard work. With adequate guidance, vast number of children can achieve significant success in different types of sports or music, and this was the strategy that Ukraine adopted to prepare their soccer international team to the World Cup in 2018. In 2012, Ukraine focused on children’s team, selected some individuals with remarkable talents and worked hardly to prosper their performance; consequently, Ukraine won the cup in the year 2018. Same concept is followed by many musical institutions to graduate brilliant musicians. Thus, starting strict routine not only can create good performers but it can also generate super talented generations.
To conclude, despite the considerable role of natural gifts in producing magnificent talents, I hold the notion that hard work usually pays off.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-14 | b.yousefi | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | hany mohamed | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | hany mohamed | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | learnafren | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | jp30101995 | 73 | view |
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think that more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. TO what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 67
- The government’s investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. TO what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The amount of violence in movies has increased. What effect does this have on viewers? Should governments censor movies? 67
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. DISCUSS and give your o 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'worked'.
Suggestion: hardly worked
...individuals with remarkable talents and worked hardly to prosper their performance; consequen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, thus, while, sort of, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26241134752 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81609406723 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6145920811 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.909090909 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217671758713 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784255559588 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424236798332 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116449734751 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059314636326 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.