It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been a debatable topic over the years about the benefits that a person acquired though reading books to that of watching television. Many say this reading habit can improve one's cognitive abilities as well as communication skills while others opine that visual media, television, has a major impact on people. This essay will examine and reach at a sensible conclusion.
To begin with, watching television is more convenient task, which requires comparatively less effort to execute. For example, by watching a debate on television as a leisure activity, one can relax as well as gather knowledge about the topic, and ,thus, he can enhance his creativity and language skills. On the other hand, there is a chance that these people might divert from their primary responsibilities, and, thus, the qualities they have acquires through actively engaging in watching television programs remain unused.
Reading as a leisure activity, however, requires a lot of commitments and concentration to make the task more pleasurable. As the result of this effort, the imaginative capacity of a person will expand and, thus, it helps him to excel in his career. In addition to that, reading enhances the vocabulary range of an individual, for books provide a wide verity of words through an interesting manner and it helps him to be an expert in the language. As such, in order to expand one's horizons of knowledge, reading books as a hobby is always an advisable activity.
To sum up, although watching television at free time is more convenient and easy way of acquiring knowledge in a language and enhancing innovating thoughts, reading books is far more beneficial for people in the long run as it improves not only their concentration level but also their vocabulary range. In such a way, the overall productivity of a society can be increased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-14 | wamujonelo | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | hagekadis | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | wamujonelo | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | wamujonelo | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | Rakap | 89 | view |
- It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Online education and training are becoming increasingly popular in the business world. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantage 84
- It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- t has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative source of energy (wind and solar) have been encouraged to be used by some countries. To what extent is this a positive or negative development? 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...as gather knowledge about the topic, and ,thus, he can enhance his creativity and ...
^^
Line 9, column 477, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e language. As such, in order to expand ones horizons of knowledge, reading books as...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09508196721 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92227358078 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577049180328 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.7779830609 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123383886232 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042434126823 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295094327011 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0743052318016 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00936166254762 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.