It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view
People have different views about the simultaneous survival of traditional cultures and technological development. In my opinion, I argue that technology and cultures are compatibly thriving in some parts of the world.
It is true that the advances in technology lead to the disappearance of traditions in developed countries. For example, in Britain, in the pre-industrial period generations usually lived in the same families and village communities. They had outdoor activities, share common religious, beliefs and enjoy rituals and ceremonies together. While in this contemporary world, young generations tend to move to modern cities because of their ambition in making progress in their career path. They do not pay attention to longstanding traditions or cultural heritages. Most inhabitants in British villages are commuters, many of them do not know too much about their neighbours.
Apart from the valued arguments mentioned above, I concur that technologies do not detrimentally affect traditions somewhere. For instance, in some localities in Vietnam, the advances of technology are playing a huge role in traditional agricultural civilisation. Vietnamese farmers used to rely on their risky intuitions and the knowledge about weather, which is passed on by parents and elders. Today, thanks to mobile apps they could have precise weather predictions and market prices. The agricultural harvest, therefore, is significantly effective. This is strong evidence that traditional cultures still accompany the increasing development of technology.
In conclusion, there are convincing reasons to understand why some assert that technological development harms the existence of traditional culture. However, I believe they could survive together due to their reciprocal supports.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-25 | Tran Bao Long | 78 | view |
- The number of endangered species has increased significantly in the century and we can find more mass extinctions in this period of time State some reasons for this and provide possible solutions 86
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 73
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish discuss both views and give your own op 73
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ommunities. They had outdoor activities, share common religious, beliefs and enjo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, therefore, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88846153846 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28735023957 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646153846154 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0779982557 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.6875 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295163310062 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956912453221 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953407796428 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185918288061 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599865730067 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.